So in the convoluted world we live in, NYS and CT attorneys argued in support of their gun control measures, that the goal of promoting public safety is supported (rationally related) to the provisions of their laws, including the SAFE
Act 1 feature test and the 10 round limit. (Really they wanted a 7 round limit).
It was argued that for self defense, it is well established that only 2-3 rounds are actually needed as most incidents involve only a few rounds. It was argued that the fear of a need for more rounds is irrational.
Really?
Act 1 feature test and the 10 round limit. (Really they wanted a 7 round limit).
It was argued that for self defense, it is well established that only 2-3 rounds are actually needed as most incidents involve only a few rounds. It was argued that the fear of a need for more rounds is irrational.
Really?
Does Paris Attack Influence Gun Control In US?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire